Malta: Police drop charges against one Birdlife activist arraigned by mistake.

On the 25th November last year we published an article highlighting the impending court case involving several BirdLife Malta members who had been charged with the illegal possession of protected birds. These birds had been collected by BirdLife members after they had been shot by hunters, the ones alive were being brought to a veterinary for treatment. The court case was supported by the Maltese Hunting Federation (FKNK) who were claiming possession of these protected birds was an offence, irrespective of what the reason for holding them was. Read the full account here.

Yesterday (14/01/2015) the Maltese police dropped charges against one Birdlife activist Caroline Rance after an inspector admitted she was charged by mistake in a case instigated by the hunting federation.

Malta  The ‘incriminating’ photograph: six members of Birdlife Malta holding protected birds taken for treatment after being shot. Can you imagine the public outcry in Britain if under similar circumstances the police then charged an individual with possession after the bird/s found were then taken to a veterinary practice for treatment. How stupid, talk about the law being an ass.

The police charged Birdlife activists Fiona Burrows, Nicholas Barbara, Caroline Rance and Rupert Masefield for the possession of protected bird species after they appeared in a published photo holding dead birds as part of their work to highlight illegal hunting.

The police had initially declined to issue charges after receiving a complaint made by the hunting federation FKNK in October 2012 over the photo. However, the hunting federation had later filed a court challenge against the police decision.

When the case continued yesterday 14/01/2015, police Inspector Jurgen Vella  admitted that Ms Rance, who is now Birdlife’s public relations officer, was charged in error because she was not in the photo. The charges were withdrawn in the sitting.

Taking the witness stand, FKNK CEO Lino Farrugia said he could not identify all the activists in the photo but knew Nicholas Barbara, Birdlife conservation manager, and Rupert Masefield, who was a spokesman.

Mr Farrugia said it was the police’s job to establish the identities of the Birdlife activists in the photo.

FKNK president Joe Perici Calascione testified as to why he felt he had to institute these proceedings.

“We felt there was a disparity in the way justice was being administered. If I was found in possession of a protected bird, irrespective of how I came into possession of it, I would be prosecuted,” he said.

Asked by Birdlife defence lawyer if he could tell if any of the birds in the photo were alive, Mr Perici Calascione said there was the possibility that some of the birds were alive but he did not carry out an investigation into the birds.

Lawyer Stephen Tonna Lowell is appearing for the Birdlife activists. The case is being heard by Magistrate Anthony Vella.

Comments are closed.